Skip to content

Tap water by city · updated November 2026

Tap water by city, compared

Each page covers one water system: the utility that treats the water, plus the towns that buy from it.

Short answer

We cover 40 US water systems. 36 of 40 had no health-based violations in the five years through September 2026, and 11 had PFOA or PFOS (two PFAS “forever chemicals”) samples above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 4 parts per trillion (ppt) limit in its 2023–25 testing. Hardness ranges from soft to very hard, which is the reading that decides whether a softener is worth it.

EPA UCMR 5, EPA SDWIS, utility water quality reports · Sources and method

CityHardnessgpgHardness classDisinfectantPFOA highpptPFOS highpptLithium highµg/LHealth violations5 years
Albuquerque, NM8.8HardFree chlorinenonenone710
Atlanta, GAnot publishedFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Austin, TX5.4Moderately hardChloraminenone4.8none1
Baltimore, MD5.5Moderately hardFree chlorinenonenonenone3
Boston, MA0.9SoftChloraminenonenonenone0
Charlotte, NC1.9SoftFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Chicago, ILnot publishedFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Cincinnati, OH7.5HardFree chlorinenone6.1none0
Cleveland, OH6.8Moderately hardFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Columbus, OH6.7Moderately hardFree chlorine5.3nonenone0
Dallas, TX8.0HardChloramine6.35.1none0
Denver, CO6.1Moderately hardChloraminenonenone110
Detroit, MI6.3Moderately hardFree chlorinenonenonenone0
El Paso, TX10.2HardFree chlorinenone8.51330
Fort Worth, TX7.5HardChloramine8.37.3none0
Houston, TX7.9HardChloraminenonenone341
Indianapolis, IN18.5Very hardChloraminenonenonenone0
Jacksonville, FL14.4Very hardFree chlorinenonenone140
Kansas City, MO5.8Moderately hardChloraminenonenone590
Las Vegas, NV16.4Very hardFree chlorinenonenone430
Los Angeles, CA7.5HardChloraminenonenone1000
Louisville, KY7.5HardChloramine7.5nonenone0
Memphis, TN2.8SoftFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Miami, FLnot publishedChloramine14.033.0none0
Milwaukee, WI8.1HardChloraminenonenonenone0
Minneapolis, MN5.5Moderately hardChloraminenonenonenone0
Nashville, TN5.9Moderately hardFree chlorinenonenonenone0
New York, NY1.9SoftFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Oklahoma City, OKnot publishedChloraminenonenone680
Philadelphia, PA8.9HardChloramine8.16.0none0
Phoenix, AZnot publishedFree chlorinenonenone1600
Portland, OR0.5SoftChloraminenonenonenone0
San Antonio, TX17.5Very hardFree chlorinenonenone260
San Diego, CA14.0Very hardChloraminenonenone650
San Francisco, CA3.6Moderately hardChloraminenonenonenone0
San Jose, CA8.8HardChlorine and chloraminenone6.2101
Seattle, WA1.5SoftFree chlorinenonenonenone0
Tampa, FL10.8Very hardChloramine4.66.9none0
Tucson, AZnot publishedFree chlorinenonenone640
Washington, DC8.1HardChloraminenonenonenone0
  • Red: above EPA’s level. That’s 4 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and PFOS. For lithium it’s 10 micrograms per liter (µg/L), a health reference level rather than a legal limit, which EPA compares at one significant digit, so up to 15 µg/L counts as at the level.
  • "None" means not detected. "High" is the highest single sample.
  • Sources: hardness from each utility’s published water quality data; PFAS and lithium from EPA’s national testing (UCMR 5), sampled mostly 2023 to 2025; violations from EPA’s federal drinking water database (SDWIS).

Hardness, by city

0 to 300 mg/L as calcium carbonate

  1. Indianapolis18.5
  2. San Antonio17.5
  3. Las Vegas16.4
  4. Jacksonville14.4
  5. San Diego14.0
  6. Tampa10.8
  7. El Paso10.2
  8. Philadelphia8.9
  9. Albuquerque8.8
  10. San Jose8.8
  11. Washington8.1
  12. Milwaukee8.1
  13. Dallas8.0
  14. Houston7.9
  15. Fort Worth7.5
  16. Los Angeles7.5
  17. Louisville7.5
  18. Cincinnati7.5
  19. Cleveland6.8
  20. Columbus6.7
  21. Detroit6.3
  22. Denver6.1
  23. Nashville5.9
  24. Kansas City5.8
  25. Baltimore5.5
  26. Minneapolis5.5
  27. Austin5.4
  28. San Francisco3.6
  29. Memphis2.8
  30. New York1.9
  31. Charlotte1.9
  32. Seattle1.5
  33. Boston0.9
  34. Portland0.5
Each dot is the utility’s published average or range midpoint; the outline shows its published range. Classes per USGS. Source: each utility’s latest water quality report.