Skip to content

Tap water report · updated November 2026

El Paso tap water: hard water, PFOS samples up to 8.5 ppt (EPA limit 4)

What’s in the water El Paso Water delivers to 747,168 people, from national testing by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the utility’s own report.

Short answer

El Paso tap water is hard: about 10.2 grains per gallon (175 milligrams per liter (mg/L)), depending on which treatment plant serves your neighborhood (63 to 236 mg/L), according to published water quality data from El Paso Water (2017, the most recent figures we found). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2023–26 testing found PFOS (a PFAS “forever chemical”) at 8.5 parts per trillion (ppt) in its highest samples, above the 4 ppt limit utilities must meet by 2029. Lithium reached 133 micrograms per liter (µg/L), above EPA’s 10 µg/L health reference level, which is not a legal limit. The system had no health-based violations in the five years through September 2026. Of the 40 large US water systems The Water Monitor tracks, El Paso has the 2nd-highest PFAS sample and the 2nd-highest lithium.

Sources: El Paso Water 2017 data, EPA UCMR 5, EPA SDWIS 2026Q3 · Sources and method

Hardness

10.2gpg

175 mg/L

Hard

El Paso Water, 2017 data

PFAS (PFOA, PFOS)

8.5ppt

PFOS, highest sample

Above EPA’s 4 ppt limit

EPA UCMR 5, sampled 2023–26

Disinfectant

Free chlorine

Carbon filters remove it

El Paso Water

Lithium

133µg/L

highest sample

Above EPA’s 10 µg/L reference

EPA UCMR 5, no legal limit

Violations

0

health-based, 5 years

None on record

EPA SDWIS, through September 2026

How El Paso compares with the 40 systems we track

  • Hardness

    7th hardest

    of 34 systems

  • PFOA / PFOS

    2nd highest

    of 11 that detected any

  • Lithium

    2nd highest

    of 14 that detected it

  • Size

    28th largest

    of 40 by people served

Compare every system in the 2026 report →

01 · What it means

What these readings mean for your home

Each reading in plain English: what it is, how El Paso compares with the other systems we track, and whether there’s anything to do. The tags follow EPA’s limits and reference levels where EPA has one; for hardness, which has no EPA limit, they follow the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scale and Minnesota’s health department. New to the acronyms? Every term, in plain English.

Hardness

Worth acting on

Hardness is dissolved calcium and magnesium, picked up as water runs through rock. It isn’t a health issue (EPA has no limit for it). It’s what leaves white crust on faucets, spots on glasses and scale inside your water heater. It’s measured in grains per gallon (gpg); 1 gpg is about 17 mg of minerals in a liter.

Here: At 10.2 gpg, El Paso water is hard, the 7th-hardest of the 34 systems we track. Most homes here notice scale and spotting.

What to do: A water softener is the only whole-house system that removes hardness. Size it to your household so it doesn’t waste salt.

What the research says: Studies tie hard water to more soap use and scale. Observational studies link it with somewhat more eczema in babies, but in the largest trial a softener didn’t improve existing eczema. The studies →

Learn more →

PFAS (PFOA and PFOS)

Worth acting on

PFAS are a family of thousands of manufactured chemicals used in many consumer and industrial products. They break down very slowly, which is why people call them "forever chemicals." PFOA and PFOS are the two EPA regulates most tightly. They’re measured in parts per trillion (ppt): 1 ppt is about one drop in 20 Olympic swimming pools.

Here: El Paso’s highest PFOS sample was 8.5 ppt, about 2 times EPA’s 4 ppt limit, the 2nd-highest of the 40 we track. 11 of the 40 had a sample over the limit; 29 had none detected at all. These are samples from EPA’s 2023–26 testing, not a violation: utilities have until 2029 to get under the limit on a yearly average.

What to do: A filter on the tap you drink and cook from handles it. Look for reverse osmosis certified to NSF/ANSI 58, or carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53, for PFOA and PFOS by name.

What the research says: EPA and the National Academies link PFOA and PFOS exposure to higher cholesterol, lower vaccine response, lower birth weight and some cancers, mostly over years of drinking the water. The studies →

Learn more →

Disinfectant

Nothing to do

Utilities add a small amount of chlorine, or chloramine (chlorine combined with a little ammonia), so germs can’t grow in the pipes on the way to your tap. EPA allows up to 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of either and says water within its standards can be used for drinking, cooking and bathing.

Here: El Paso uses free chlorine. It’s the one that can give tap water a slight pool smell, and it’s easy to filter.

What to do: For taste, any carbon filter certified to NSF/ANSI 42 for chlorine works.

What the research says: Health agencies call these levels acceptable for drinking and bathing; dialysis and fish tanks are the exceptions. Studies haven’t shown shower chlorine harms skin or hair. The studies →

Learn more →

Lithium

Worth knowing

Lithium is a metal that occurs naturally in some rock and groundwater. There’s no legal limit in drinking water. EPA screens results against 10 micrograms per liter (µg/L) while it studies whether a limit is needed.

Here: El Paso’s highest sample was 133 µg/L, about 13 times EPA’s screening level, 2nd-highest of the 40. 11 of the 40 were above it. Nationally, about 24% of large systems are.

What to do: No action is required, since there’s no limit. If you want less, ask a filter maker for independent test data on lithium specifically, since a PFAS or chlorine certification says nothing about it.

What the research says: Some regional studies link natural lithium with lower suicide rates and the largest individual study found no link. EPA’s screening level is cautious, not a harm threshold. The studies →

Learn more →

Health-based violations

Nothing to do

A health-based violation means the utility broke a federal drinking water rule tied to health: it went over a limit, or skipped a required treatment step. Missing a paperwork deadline doesn’t count.

Here: El Paso’s system had none in the five years through September 2026. That’s normal for a large system: 36 of the 40 we track had none.

What to do: Nothing to do.

Learn more →

How El Paso compares: highest PFOA or PFOS sample

Parts per trillion (ppt), from EPA’s 2023–25 testing. The dashed line is EPA’s limit of 4.

  1. Miami33.0 PFOS
  2. El Paso8.5 PFOS
  3. Fort Worth8.3 PFOA
  4. Philadelphia8.1 PFOA
  5. Louisville7.5 PFOA
  6. Tampa6.9 PFOS
  7. Dallas6.3 PFOA
  8. San Jose6.2 PFOS
  9. Cincinnati6.1 PFOS
  10. Columbus5.3 PFOA
  11. Austin4.8 PFOS
Each bar is one system’s highest single sample, not a yearly average. 11 of 40 systems detected PFOA or PFOS; the other 29 had nothing at or above 4 ppt. All 40 systems

If you live in El Paso

El Paso’s water is hard. Softeners from brands that sell online, at their own store prices:

02 · The full results

Every PFAS result EPA recorded

In EPA’s national testing (sampled 2023 to 2026), El Paso’s highest samples reached PFOS at 8.5 ppt, above EPA’s 4 ppt limit. These are individual samples, not a compliance finding: water systems have until 2029 to meet the limit, judged on a yearly average.

Lithium reached 133 µg/L, above EPA’s health reference level of 10 µg/L. That level is a screening benchmark, not a legal limit, and about 24% of large US systems tested above it.

Results from EPA’s national testing program (UCMR 5) for El Paso Water, 27 sampling points, July 2023 to May 2026. Concentrations in parts per trillion (ppt).

EPA UCMR 5 PFAS results for El Paso
ChemicalSamplesDetectedHighestEPA limit
PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid)570none4
PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid)5728.54
PFHxS5735.510
PFNA570none10
HFPO-DA (GenX)570none10

"None" means every sample was under EPA’s reporting level (4 ppt for PFOA). PFHxS, PFNA and HFPO-DA (GenX) are three other PFAS chemicals; EPA proposed removing their limits in May 2026, and that isn’t final.

03 · Where it comes from

The source, and who else drinks it

El Paso Water uses one surface source, the Rio Grande, and two groundwater sources, the Mesilla Bolson and Hueco Bolson aquifers, and most customers get water from two sources depending on the time of year.

El Paso Water serves about 747,168 people directly, and 9 other water systems buy water from it, serving about 154,831 more. If you live in one of them, most of what’s on this page describes your water too, though hardness and disinfectant can change if your system blends in its own wells.

El Paso Water runs the Kay Bailey Hutchison Desalination Plant, which treats well water from the Fort Bliss and Airport well fields.

El Paso’s water system had no health-based violations in the five years through September 2026, according to EPA’s federal database.

Largest systems that buy from El Paso Water

  • Lower Valley Water District59,049
  • Paseo Del Este MUD 136,773
  • Fort Bliss Main Post Area28,000
  • East Biggs Water System15,000
  • East Montana Water System11,480
  • Village of Vinton2,684
  • Haciendas Del Norte Water Improvement Di1,074
  • Gaslight Square Mobile Home Park675
  • San Isidro Mhp96

From EPA’s federal drinking water database (SDWIS), 2026Q3: community systems with an active connection buying from TX0710002. Population served.

ZIP codes El Paso Water reports serving (11)

79821 · 79901 · 79902 · 79904 · 79912 · 79915 · 79924 · 79927 · 79935 · 79936 · 79938

From EPA’s UCMR 5 ZIP file. A ZIP can be served by more than one system; your water bill names yours. Look up any ZIP.

04 · Questions

El Paso water questions

Is El Paso tap water safe to drink?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) doesn’t grade a city’s tap water as safe or unsafe; it sets limits and records violations. By that record, El Paso’s water system had no health-based violations of federal drinking water rules in the five years through September 2026. Separately, EPA’s 2023–26 testing found PFOA or PFOS (two PFAS “forever chemicals”) samples above the 4 parts per trillion (ppt) limit that utilities must meet, on a yearly average, by 2029. A filter certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA and PFOS addresses it at the tap.

Is El Paso tap water hard?

El Paso tap water is hard: about 10.2 grains per gallon (175 milligrams per liter (mg/L)), depending on which treatment plant serves your neighborhood (63 to 236 mg/L), according to published water quality data from El Paso Water (2017, the most recent figures we found).

Does El Paso tap water have PFAS?

In the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) national testing (sampled 2023 to 2026), El Paso’s highest samples reached PFOS (a PFAS “forever chemical”) at 8.5 parts per trillion (ppt), above EPA’s 4 ppt limit. These are individual samples, not a compliance finding: water systems have until 2029 to meet the limit, judged on a yearly average.

Does El Paso use chlorine or chloramine?

Free chlorine. El Paso Water says it uses chlorine to disinfect the drinking water.

Has El Paso’s water system had violations?

El Paso’s water system had no health-based violations in the five years through September 2026, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) federal database.

Is there lithium in El Paso water?

Lithium reached 133 micrograms per liter (µg/L), above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) health reference level of 10 µg/L. That level is a screening benchmark, not a legal limit, and about 24% of large US systems tested above it.